What does Attorney Match actually do?

You describe your legal situation and pay a one-time $10 fee. The software classifies your matter, ranks the attorneys we have whose public profiles fit your case and your state, and writes a personalized outreach letter for each one that you can edit and send. The number of matches varies by state and practice area. It is a directory and matching tool — it helps you find an attorney, it does not replace one.

Is this legal advice?

No. Attorney Match is not a law firm, not a lawyer-referral service, and not a substitute for a licensed attorney. Nothing on this site or in your results is legal advice, and using the Service does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Anyone trying to find the right attorney for a specific situation — individuals, families, and small businesses who want a qualified, jurisdiction-matched shortlist instead of guessing through search results.

What does it cost, and is there a subscription?

It is a one-time $10 fee for an initial case, $5 for a re-run on an existing account, and free filtering of results you already paid for. There is no recurring billing, ever.

Where do the attorney listings come from?

The directory is built from public state-bar licensee data and public court records (including the Free Law Project / CourtListener), plus attorneys who claim and enrich their own listing. Attorneys never pay to rank.

Will you contact attorneys for me or sell my information?

No. We draft outreach letters for you to send. We never blast your matter to anyone and we do not sell your information. Your case description and uploads are encrypted at rest.

How is this different from a referral service?

A referral service is paid by attorneys to send them leads. Attorney Match takes no money from attorneys and never sends them your case — it ranks public profiles by fit and hands you the shortlist and draft letters to act on yourself.

Case tracker · Social media addiction

In re Social Media Adolescent Addiction/Personal Injury Products Liability Litigation (MDL No. 3047)

Social media addiction

Ongoing

MDL formed Oct 6, 2022

AI system / company: Meta/Instagram, Snap/Snapchat, TikTok/ByteDance, Google/YouTube
Jurisdiction: United States (federal)
Court / regulator: U.S. District Court, N.D. Cal. (Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers)
Status: Ongoing

What happened

Consolidated federal multidistrict litigation gathering thousands of personal-injury claims, hundreds of school-district suits, and state attorney general actions alleging that social media platforms were designed to maximize adolescent screen time and foster addiction, causing emotional and physical harms including death. By early 2026 it included more than 10,000 individual cases and nearly 800 school-district lawsuits. Snap and TikTok reached settlements in January 2026 ahead of the first bellwether trial.

About social media addiction cases

Claims that platforms were deliberately engineered to maximize compulsive use — infinite scroll, autoplay, variable-reward notifications — causing measurable harm, especially to minors.

Sources

Attorneys who handle social media addiction cases

Anand Kumar Chavakula
Maryland
Civil rights
Consumer protection / unfair practices
Draft intro email
Opens your email app with a ready-to-edit draft. Replace the bracketed prompts with your details before sending. Free — no account needed.
Benjamin Edwin Calpino
Florida
Civil rights
Consumer protection / unfair practices
Draft intro email
Opens your email app with a ready-to-edit draft. Replace the bracketed prompts with your details before sending. Free — no account needed.
Laurel LaMontagne
District of Columbia
Civil rights
Consumer protection / unfair practices
Draft intro email
Opens your email app with a ready-to-edit draft. Replace the bracketed prompts with your details before sending. Free — no account needed.
Ross Q. Panko
District of Columbia
Civil rights
Consumer protection / unfair practices
Draft intro email
Opens your email app with a ready-to-edit draft. Replace the bracketed prompts with your details before sending. Free — no account needed.
Peter Andrew Koziol
Florida
Civil rights
Consumer protection / unfair practices
Draft intro email
Opens your email app with a ready-to-edit draft. Replace the bracketed prompts with your details before sending. Free — no account needed.
Timothy B. Hyland
Virginia
Civil rights
Consumer protection / unfair practices
Draft intro email
Opens your email app with a ready-to-edit draft. Replace the bracketed prompts with your details before sending. Free — no account needed.

More social media addiction cases →

Related cases

Social Media Cases (JCCP 5255) (Ongoing)
State AG Coalition v. TikTok (2024 addictive-design suits) (Ongoing)

Informational summary compiled from the cited public sources. Not legal advice, not a complete case record, and not affiliated with any party. Attorney Match does not receive referral fees. Verify current status with primary sources before relying on this entry.

In re Social Media Adolescent Addiction/Personal Injury Products Liability Litigation (MDL No. 3047)

Social media addiction

Ongoing

MDL formed Oct 6, 2022

AI system / company

Meta/Instagram, Snap/Snapchat, TikTok/ByteDance, Google/YouTube

Jurisdiction

United States (federal)

Court / regulator

U.S. District Court, N.D. Cal. (Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers)

Status

Ongoing

What happened

About social media addiction cases

Claims that platforms were deliberately engineered to maximize compulsive use — infinite scroll, autoplay, variable-reward notifications — causing measurable harm, especially to minors.

Attorneys who handle social media addiction cases

Anand Kumar Chavakula
Maryland
Civil rights
Consumer protection / unfair practices
Draft intro email
Opens your email app with a ready-to-edit draft. Replace the bracketed prompts with your details before sending. Free — no account needed.
Benjamin Edwin Calpino
Florida
Civil rights
Consumer protection / unfair practices
Draft intro email
Opens your email app with a ready-to-edit draft. Replace the bracketed prompts with your details before sending. Free — no account needed.
Laurel LaMontagne
District of Columbia
Civil rights
Consumer protection / unfair practices
Draft intro email
Opens your email app with a ready-to-edit draft. Replace the bracketed prompts with your details before sending. Free — no account needed.
Ross Q. Panko
District of Columbia
Civil rights
Consumer protection / unfair practices
Draft intro email
Opens your email app with a ready-to-edit draft. Replace the bracketed prompts with your details before sending. Free — no account needed.
Peter Andrew Koziol
Florida
Civil rights
Consumer protection / unfair practices
Draft intro email
Opens your email app with a ready-to-edit draft. Replace the bracketed prompts with your details before sending. Free — no account needed.
Timothy B. Hyland
Virginia
Civil rights
Consumer protection / unfair practices
Draft intro email
Opens your email app with a ready-to-edit draft. Replace the bracketed prompts with your details before sending. Free — no account needed.

More social media addiction cases →